COVID-19 & Vaccines: The Facts and Science

Looking to get the facts and science about COVID-19 and the vaccines? Here’s what you need to know in a nutshell, from official sources.

Since the very start of the pandemic in March 2020, we have been informed of facts in a very dishonest fashion, and this on a global scale. In perspective, when we stop and analyze the data shared by the “official sources” from governments agencies all around the world, we then comprehend that COVID-19 is far from what we’ve been initially told. 

To help us grasp everything, we’ve listed the TOP TOPICS that mainstream media has failed to explained about the facts and science behind COVID-19 and it’s vaccines.

1 – The World Total of COVID-19 Deaths, and it’s Initial Prediction from the World Health Organization (WHO)

The coronavirus fatality rate reported by the media was completely inaccurate and the actual rate is less than the current seasonal flu. The false reporting of the coronavirus fatality rate of 3.4% (272 million estimated deaths worldwide) in the media started with the statements made by the WHO in early March 2020. [1]

“Globally, about 3.4% of reported COVID-19 cases have died. By comparison, seasonal flu generally kills far fewer than 1% of those infected.”

This statement led to the greatest panic in world history as the media all over the world shared and repeated that the coronavirus was many, many times more deadly than the common flu. Oftentimes estimates have to be made because data is just not yet available. The Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO), Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, used the fatality rate of coronavirus with known numbers and used this as his prediction of eventual mortality rate. This was a faulty assumption. 

In reality, the coronavirus is not more fatal than the flu based on current data available, which the annual estimated rate is less than 0.1% (3.5 million deaths worldwide as of June 2021) [2]. It is actually much less fatal than the flu based on current data. Similar to the flu, those most at risk of dying from the coronavirus are the elderly and the sick. The average age for those who died from the coronavirus is 80 years old. This is consistent around the world [3]. There have been no known fatalities for any children 10 and under.

Reference from official global sources:
[1] https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19—3-march-2020
[2] https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-death-rate/
[3] https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-age-sex-demographics/
https://covid19.who.int/

2 – The Comorbidity Rate of COVID-19

A recent report from the CDC shows that currently the number of deaths that are caused by COVID-19 ONLY are actually 5% and the number may actually be less, because the CDC shares there may be “a lack of detail” about the other conditions that contributed to the death [4]:

Knowing now the admission of the CDC, we can now estimate the real number of 175,000 deaths in total. And to put this in perspective, we can also rank COVID-19 to the 47 rank of all death causes worldwide as of June 2021 [5] [6].

Reference from official US government:
[4] https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/covid19/mortality-overview.htm
[5] https://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/world-rankings-total-deaths
[6] https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/number-of-deaths-per-year?country=~OWID_WRL

3 – PCR Tests is Potentially Flawed

The WHO has released a memorandum which potentially completely undermines all the “pandemic” case numbers from all over the world.

On the 13th of January 2021, they put out this memo [7], stating that a single positive PCR test should not be used for diagnosing Sars-Cov-2 infection.

To quote the WHO directly:

“Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.”

Translation: If you get a positive test for someone with no symptoms, re-test them. Or rather: any PCR positive test is potentially a false positive.

Also, there has been a great deal of controversy over claims that Kary Mullis, the creator of the PCR technology that is being widely used to test for so-called ‘cases’ of COVID-19, did not believe the technology was suitable for detecting a meaningful presence of a virus. He quoted [8]:

“I don’t think you can misuse PCR. [It is] the results; the interpretation of it. If they can find this virus in you at all – and with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.”

“It doesn’t tell you that you are sick, or that the thing that you ended up with was going to hurt you or anything like that.”

[8]:

In a July 16, 2020, podcast, Tony Fauci says the test is useless when it’s run at 35 cycles or higher. The FDA says run the test up to 40 cycles, in order to determine whether the virus is there. This is the crime in a nutshell. Each “cycle” of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and magnification of the test specimen taken from the patient. Too many cycles, and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant. That’s called a false positive [9].

“…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent [aka accurate] are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”

What Anthony Fauci failed to say on the video is: the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35.

[9]:

First, we have a CDC quote on the FDA website, in a document titled [10] 10a] [10b]: “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only.” See PDF page 38 (doc page 37). This document is marked, “Effective: 12/01/2020.” That means, even though the virus is being referred to by its older name, the document is still relevant as of December 2020. “For Emergency Use Only” refers to the fact that the FDA has certified the PCR test under a traditional category called “Emergency Use Authorization.”

FDA quote:

“…a specimen is considered positive for 2019-nCoV [virus] if all 2019-nCoV marker (N1, N2) cycle threshold growth curves cross the threshold line within 40.00 cycles ([less than] 40.00 Ct).”

Reference from official US government:
[7] https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-2021-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users-2020-05
[10] https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

[10a] CDC-006-00019, Revision: 06, CDC/DDID/NCIRD/ Division of Viral Diseases, Effective: 12/01/2020; see: https://web.archive.org/web/20210102171026/https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

[10b] CDC-006-00019, Revision: 05, CDC/DDID/NCIRD/ Division of Viral Diseases, Effective: 07/13/2020; see: https://web.archive.org/web/20200715004004/https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

4 – COVID-19 and the Sanitary Measures

CDC first said not to wear masks, then to wear masks, then masks were better than vaccines – now new evidence shows masks are ineffective.

Around March of 2020, Dr. Robert Redfield told the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee that healthy people should not wear face masks.

Rochelle Walensky, CDC Director even tweeted about it.

According to the CDC own guidelines back in march of 2020, they stated the following [11]:

“If you are NOT sick: You do not need to wear a facemask…”

But like so much else coming from the completely ridiculous US medical elites they changed their mind a few weeks later and changed their guidelines many times over. They even deleted their own webpage with the past information [11a].

Now the CDC has reported: 85% of COVID-19 patients report ‘always’ or ‘often’ wearing a mask.

The CDC study, which surveyed symptomatic COVID-19 patients, has found that 70.6% of respondents reported “always” wearing a mask, while an additional 14.4% say they “often” wear a mask [12]. That means a whopping 85% of infected COVID-19 patients reported habitual mask wearing [13]. Only 3.9% of those infected said they “never” wear a face covering.

[13]:

Reference from official US government:
[11] https://web.archive.org/web/20200314163759/https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prepare/prevention.html
[11a] https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prepare/prevention.html
[12] https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6936a5.htm

5 – Hydroxychloroquine (COVID-19 Treatment)

Chloroquine is an antimalarial drug that was developed in 1934. Hydroxychloroquine, an analogue of chloroquine, was developed in 1946. Hydroxychloroquine is used to treat autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis, in addition to malaria.

Prior March 2020, state governors restricted physicians from prescribing a medication approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for more than 65 years and empowering pharmacies to overrule how doctors want to treat their patients. The FDA stated that hydroxychloroquine posed serious cardiac adverse events and other potentially dangerous side-effects [13]. 

On June 2, 2020, the Association of American Physicians & Surgeons (AAPS) filed a lawsuit, AAPS v. FDA, to end its arbitrary interference with the use of hydroxychloroquine. The frontline doctors from across the US held a “White Coat Summit” on July 2020 in Washington DC to dispel the misinformation and myths surrounding the Coronavirus [14].

Dr. Stella Immanuel said she has personally treated over 350 patients with COVID-19 with Hydroxychloroquine, Zinc, and Zithromax and they have all recovered. The doctor also disclosed that she put herself and her staff on Hydroxychloroquine as a preventative.

[14]:

The peer reviewed refereed study, published July 2, 2020, in one of the most prestigious and relevant to COVID-19 medical journals in the world, the International Journal of Infectious Diseases, has just found that in fact administering Hydroxychloroquine by itself early during a hospitalization cuts down death rate by half from the raw data [15]. 

“In the multivariable Cox regression model of mortality using the group receiving neither hydroxychloroquine or azithromycin as the reference, treatment with hydroxychloroquine alone decreased the mortality hazard ratio by 66% (p < 0.001), and hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin decreased the mortality hazard ratio by 71% (p < 0.001).”

If you search “Dr. Zev Zelinko MD hydroxychloroquine” you will discover he is a prominent New York doctor currently batting near 100% success with over 2,500 COVID-19 patients. He has been a very vocal proponent of this low cost effective drug cocktail, which he has used consistently as his COVID-19 treatment protocol.

Many other doctors in the field were reporting excellent success and were likewise ignored. Other doctors were noticing very early on in the outbreak that people who were routinely taking hydroxychloroquine for conditions such as Lupus and Rheumatoid Arthritis appeared to be immune to COVID-19.

President Trump admitted he has been taking Hydroxychloroquine for “a couple weeks.” As expected, the Democrat-media complex went crazy in response to Trump taking the anti-malaria drug that has been safely prescribed to people since the 1950s. The White House Press Sec blasted CNN anchor Chris Cuomo for taking a less safe version of Hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19.

WHAT is going on with the health benefits of hydroxychloroquine? Is it safe or not? Yes, it’s safe. And, yes, it is saving lives [16] [17] [18]. The restrictions on using hydroxychloroquine were removed – revoked – lifted. It was approved for all situations, including in emergency rooms.

This FDA new statement tells the truth about the safety approval of hydroxychloroquine, but sadly, it’s the last line in the article. Here is the last-line [19]:

“Of note, FDA approved products may be prescribed by physicians for off-label uses if they determine it is appropriate for treating their patients, including during COVID-19.”

Here is the last paragraph of the article:

“Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are both FDA-approved to treat or prevent malaria. Hydroxychloroquine is also approved to treat autoimmune conditions such as chronic discoid lupus erythematosus, systemic lupus erythematosus in adults, and rheumatoid arthritis. Both drugs have been prescribed for years to help patients with these debilitating, or even deadly, diseases, and FDA has determined that these drugs are safe and effective when used for these diseases in accordance with their FDA-approved labeling. Of note, FDA approved products may be prescribed by physicians for off-label uses if they determine it is appropriate for treating their patients, including during COVID.”

Reference from official sources:
[13] https://www.fda.gov/safety/medical-product-safety-information/hydroxychloroquine-or-chloroquine-covid-19-drug-safety-communication-fda-cautions-against-use
[15] https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)30534-8/fulltext
[16] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/
[17] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16115318/
[18] https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-422X-2-69
[19] https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-revokes-emergency-use-authorization-chloroquine-and

6 – Can We Trust the COVID-19 Vaccines?

Dr. Fauci and the CDC are now on the record (as of April 2021) stating that the vaccine does not prevent COVID-19. The purpose of a vaccine is to inoculate the patient against being able to contract a particular disease. You get the polio vaccine to ensure you do not get polio. Same for smallpox.

The FDA flat out states that the vaccine is NOT APPROVED. Read it for yourself [20]:

Pay close attention to what the Dr. interviewed by Tucker said–people who have had COVID-19 should think twice about getting the vaccine [21].

[21]:

Clotting is not the only dangerous side effect identified with some of the vaccines. Some women are reporting a significant increase in menstrual flow [22]:

Many women have taken to social media to talk about how they’re experiencing heavier-than-normal periods and other menstrual changes after getting vaccinated.  Aaron Stewart, MD of Baptist Health Medical Group Obstetrics and Gynecology adds, “While some women have reported changes in their menstrual cycle with both the Covid-19 infection and the vaccine, the changes are generally thought to be temporary.”

A Peer Review made by The Lancet on April 2021, and contrarily to the 95% efficacy reported of the COVID-19 vaccines by Big-Pharma, a rather small percentage of 1.3% efficacy and under is now confirmed from their study [23].

Passage from their review:
“Vaccine efficacy is generally reported as a relative risk reduction (RRR). It uses the relative risk (RR)—ie, the ratio of attack rates with and without a vaccine—which is expressed as 1–RR. Ranking by reported efficacy gives relative risk reductions of 95% for the Pfizer–BioNTech, 94% for the Moderna–NIH, 90% for the Gamaleya, 67% for the J&J, and 67% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford vaccines.” …

“Although the RRR considers only participants who could benefit from the vaccine, the absolute risk reduction (ARR), which is the difference between attack rates with and without a vaccine, considers the whole population.”

“ARRs tend to be ignored because they give a much less impressive effect size than RRRs: 1·3% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford, 1·2% for the Moderna–NIH, 1·2% for the J&J, 0·93% for the Gamaleya, and 0·84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines.”

On another matter about the vaccines, a viral video censored on social media of Dr. Ryan Cole, owner and operator of Cole Diagnostics, was explaining the dangers of the COVID-19 vaccine. The Idaho doctor said he is not anti-vaccine but he warned against the experimental COVID-19 jabs [24].

Quote:

“We’ve seen more deaths from this shot than all vaccines in the last 20 years combined — and that’s just in the first 4 to 5 months,”

Dr. Cole said he saw a study that said 3% of injuries from the COVID-19 vaccine will be permanent:

“If you figure 100 million people got the shots, that’s 3 million with a permanent injury.”

[24]:

Indeed, according to the CDC website [emphasis added] [25]:
“Over 285 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through May 24, 2021. During this time, VAERS received 4,863 reports of death (0.0017%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. CDC and FDA physicians review each case report of death as soon as notified and CDC requests medical records to further assess reports”

There are more US deaths related to vaccines in 2021 in less than 6 months than there were the entire past decade [26].

This data comes from the CDC’s VAERS database [27]:

And finally, The Red Cross wants your blood, but NOT IF YOU HAVE BEEN VACCINATED [28]. The Red Cross is following FDA blood donation eligibility guidance for those who receive a COVID-19 vaccination, and deferral times may vary depending on the type of vaccine an individual receives [29].

“If you’ve received a COVID-19 vaccine, you’ll need to provide the manufacturer name when you come to donate.”

“Individuals who have received a COVID-19 vaccine are not able to donate convalescent plasma with the Red Cross.”

[28]:

Reference from official sources:
[20] https://www.fda.gov/media/144638/download
[22] https://share.baptisthealth.com/vaccine-effects-on-womens-periods/
[23] https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00069-0/fulltext?fbclid=IwAR0Gv60nG71IZrTBGRZE2WN969edGbd33-txgeatEvTfp1KRTZQXNdHV_9U
[25] https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/adverse-events.html
[26] https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html
[29] https://www.redcrossblood.org/donate-blood/dlp/coronavirus–covid-19–and-blood-donation.html

Official Sources: 
CDC, FDA, Red Cross Blood, The WHO, The Lancet, Virologyj Bio-Med Central, PubMed, Us National Library of Medicine and National Institutes of Health, Baptist Health, International Journal of Infectious Diseases, World Life Expectancy, Our World Data, WorldoMeter